Citizen Initiative Petition
Bill #: HJR 102 (similar to HJR 72; concurrent majority of state rep districts)
LWVMO OPPOSES
Short Description: Ends majority passage of initiative petitions by imposing what is called a ‘concurrent’ majority, which is a statewide majority of all legal voters (what we currently have) AND passage in a majority of MO state representative districts. Also forbids a foreign country from sponsoring or funding initiatives and prohibits taxes on food or property by initiative.
Status of the Bill: Scheduled for hearing in the House on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 10:30 AM in the Elections and Elected Officials Committee
Talking points:
-
The citizen initiative process provides a manner for direct participation and Missourians have been able to make their voices heard through this process since 1907
-
Voting should not give preference or more weight based on zip code or acreage; each vote counts equally regardless of where you live
-
Requiring a two-condition threshold creates a rule by minority, undermining the will of all Missourians
Link to the summary of the bill: Summary of HJR 102
Call to action:
5 for Democracy: Submit testimony online here
LWV Position: See page 10, LWVUS, Impact on Issues “The League of Women Voters believes responsible government should be responsive to the will of the people…“
Bill #: HJR 72 (similar to HJR 102; concurrent majority of congressional districts)
LWVMO OPPOSES
Short Description: Ends majority rule by imposing concurrent majority; statewide majority of all legal voters AND majority of MO congressional districts. Also forbids a foreign country from sponsoring or funding initiatives and prohibits taxes on food or property by initiative.
Status of the Bill: Scheduled for hearing in the House on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 10:30 AM in the Elections and Elected Officials Committee
Talking points:
-
Voting should not give preference or more weight based on zip code or acreage; each vote counts equally regardless of where you live
-
Requiring a two-condition threshold creates a rule by minority, undermining the will of all Missourians
-
The IP has worked for both conservative and liberal causes which shows that it is a valuable and valued part of our heritage and works for all Missourians of all different points of view
Link to the summary of the bill: Summary of HJR 72
Call to action:
5 for Democracy: Submit testimony online here for HJR 72
LWV Position: See page 10, LWVUS, Impact on Issues “The League of Women Voters believes responsible government should be responsive to the will of the people…“
Bill #: HB 1749
LWVMO OPPOSES
Short Description: Sets up hurdles for the initiative petition (IP) process by making it more difficult to gather signatures and makes successful signature gathering efforts vulnerable to legal challenges, imposes a 30-day residency requirement for petition gatherers and petition gatherers cannot be paid based on number of signatures collected and states that only a Missouri registered voter (as opposed to any MO citizen now) can challenge ballot title or fiscal note and no court can issue relief on such a challenge less than 8 weeks before election day or the Secretary of State's determination that the number of signatures to get a IP on the ballot is insufficient
Status of the Bill: Scheduled for hearing in the House on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 10:30 AM in the Elections and Elected Officials Committee
Talking points:
-
The 30 day residency requirement for signature gatherers Increases the costs of initiative petition efforts and makes the signature gathering process more difficult by restricting the talent pool of signature gatherers
-
The 30 day residency requirement restricts the ability of recently transferred / moved military to participate in the signature gathering process as well as students and others who move to this state and want to contribute immediately
-
The legislation would allow litigation to scuttle a successful signature gathering effort by seeking a ruling that alters petition language
Link to the summary of the bill: Summary of HB 1749
Call to action:
5 for Democracy: Submit testimony online here for HB 1749
LWV Position: See page 10, LWVUS, Impact on Issues “The League of Women Voters believes responsible government should be responsive to the will of the people…“